OUR BLESSED LORD WARNS ABOUT THE NEW LITURGY – THE NOVUS ORDO MASS

     Please pause a minute and pray the Hail Mary before reading: Hail Mary, full of grace. Our Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen

This article reveals messages received by two privileged souls in regard to the new Mass. The first chosen soul we will deal with in this paper is Marie Julie Jahenny (1850-1941). She may well be one of the greatest mystics and stigmatist women in the history of the Catholic church.

     Marie Julie Jahenny, the mystic and stigmatist of La Fraudais, was born on the 122th of February, 1850, in a little village in Britttany (in the west of France), called Blain. The eldest of five children, she was brought up by her simple, good parents in that lively faith for which Britons are renowned. Our Lord favored her with many graces from the time of her First Holy Communion, graces to which she corresponded with ever increasing devotion. She joined the Franciscan Third Order when in her early twenties, to help to sanctify herself in the world.                                                                                                                                                                                            

     In 1873, she received from heaven that most remarkable mystic gift, the stigmata. From the age of 23 until her death, some 60 years later, she bore in her body the wounds of Our Lord to a more visible degree than had any other stigmatist in the Church’s history. In addition to the five wounds of the Sacred hands, Feet, and Side, Mari Julie suffered the wounds inflicted by the Crown of Thorns and the Cross on Our Lord’s Sacred Head and Shoulder respectively, the wounds of his Scourging, those caused by the ropes with which he was bounbd, as well as other wounds of a more mystic nature.

     Henceforth, Marie Julie lived her life of co-redemptive suffering (as a victim soul), in a little cottage in a little hamlet of La Fraudais, near Blain. She thus fulfilled Our Blessed Lord’s desire for her to make reparation for the sins of France and the world. She was favored with frequent visions of Jesus and Mary, as well as many prophetic lights.

     The truth of the heavenly warnings of which she was to be the humble messenger was vindicated by her characteristic simplicity and honesty, her exemplary obedience to her spiritual directors and her Bishop, and of course, by the fulfillment of all she prophesied during her long life. With unfailing accuracy she foretold the two world wars, the election of Pope St. Pius X, the various persecutions of the Church, the chastisements and the fate of apostate France. Much remains to unfold. Her warnings for the last Times should be read by all ‘’who have ears.’’

     Marie Julie was the wonder of the many scientists who examined her continually, the scorn of unbelievers, and the proud, the admiration of her lifelong friend, Monsignor Fourier, Bishop of Nantes, and the devoted circle of those who made the diffusion of her messages to an ungrateful and unheeding world their life’s work. She went to her heavenly reward on March 4, 1941.

    Blind, deaf, dumb and crippled, she had subsisted miraculously on the Blessed Sacrament alone, for the last many years of her life. Surely then, we will not pass over lightly what God has confided to her for the benefit of our own sad days. Now read Marie Julie’s prophecies concerning the new liturgy:

     On November 27, 1902 (Ed. Note: The seventy-second anniversary of the Miraculous Medal apparition [November 27, 1830]), and on May 10, 1904, Our Lord warned of the new liturgy that would one day be instituted. Bear in mind that in 1917, Our Lady of Fatima also, according to Pope Pius XII, warned again about the suicide of changing the liturgy. Jesus said to her, “I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of my Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls, a Mass that contains words which are odious in my sight. When the fatal hour arrives where the faith of my priest is put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in this second period.

     The first period is the one of My priesthood, existing since Me. The second is the one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of holy religion will impose their formulas in the book of the second celebration. Many of my priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss, Unfortunately, amongst them will be those who will accept it.”

     On May 10, 1904 Our Lady describes the new clergy and its liturgy: “They will not stop on this hateful and sacrilegious road. They will go further to compromise all at once, and in one blow, the Holy Church, the clergy, and the faith of my children.” She announces ‘’the dispersion of the pastors” by the Church herself; true pastors, who will be replaced by others formed by Hell: “…new preachers of new sacraments, new temples, new baptisms, new confraternities.” (Note. See AA 1025, MEMOIRS OF AN ANTI-APOSTLE, and also Bella Dodd, SCHOOL OF DARKNESS, which details the communist infiltration into the seminaries, these pastors “formed by Hell,” she says).

     The second chosen soul, whom Our Lord called His Portavoz (messenger) is a Mexican nun who has given universal messages from Our Lord. He commanded her to make these messages known to the whole world. The Portavox was a nun who belonged to the community of Franciscans Minims of the Perpetual Help of Mary, located in the Villa de Guadalupe in Mexico City, near the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The Franciscan Minim nuns were founded in Zamora, Mexico, in 1942, and moved to Mexico City in 1967.

     When the messages were first published in 1969, the Portavoz’ identity was kept secret, but it was revealed in 1974. She was the foundress, Maria Concepcion Zuniga Lopez (1914-1979). Since the age of twelve she received revelations from heaven. In 1931 they were investigated and approved by Archbishop Pascual Diaz Barreto, Primate of Mexico, and in 1941 by Bishop Fulcheri.

     Here are the messages she received from Our Lord about the traditional Mass: December 21, 1975: “Insist, our little daughter…about this very important point, that the modifications of desacralized worship are the profanation of the Holy, prophesied for these times.”

     May 24, 1970: “The Holy Mass must return to the rites that My Spirit has given many centuries ago, by means of My upright Vicars.” (Quo Primum, Pope St. Pius V, forbade the rites to ever be changed, and whosoever would dare do so, ‘’would incur the wrath of Almighty God, and the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul,” he said).

     June 7, 1970: “The Canon of the Mass should be said by the priest alone, in silence and in Latin, without  diminishing a single iota. The faithful should remain in silence, adoring the Eucharist, which is the ineffable Mystery of My Divine and Human love, which you will not be able to understand except in eternity.” Why should the Church insist on Latin in the liturgy? Fr. Chad Ripperger said, “Latin is a sacred language, because it was one of the languages nailed to the cross.” (Note: MYSTERIUM FIDEI; THE MYSTERY OF FAITH. When Jesus was consecrating the chalice He said, “This is the chalice of my Blood, of the new and eternal testament, the mystery of faith…” Here he refers to the Eucharist as, the ineffable mystery. The mystery of faith is Christ’s real sacramental presence on the altar. That is why, when Pope Paul VI published an encyclical on the Eucharist, it was titled MYSTERIUM FIDEI, MYSTERY OF FAITH). But now in the new Mass, the Novus Ordo, the Mystery of Faith can be any line they want to come up with! And by the way, they turned the priest around from facing Our Lord in the tabernacle, to facing the people. They put the priest’s back to Our Lord in the tabernacle to facing the people. “They have turned their backs to me, and not their face,” said Our Lord in Jeremiah, 2:27. The Mass is about the priest offering the Holy Sacrifice to God for our salvation. It’s not about the priest talking to the people. It’s about the priest talking to God. How rude would it be for someone to turn their back to someone while speaking to them.  Yet Jesus is the King, He is the Lord of heaven and earth! How rude, how disrespectful, how irreverent to turn one’s back on him while speaking to Him and His heavenly Father.

Not only that, but Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich saw a new church being built, and the angels were not assisting in its development. Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano says they are setting up a parallel church. Is this the new church she saw? Moreover, she also said she saw a Mass where the Last Gospel is no longer read. For those who are Novus Ordo Catholics who’ve never been to a traditional Mass, the Last Gospel is always read. But in the new Mass, the Novus Ordo of which we are speaking, the Last Gospel has been purged like so many other things. Plus, the Leonine Prayers prayed at the end of the Low Masses for the conversion of Russia were also omitted. As if we no longer need to pray for the conversion of Russia. Plus, the prayers carried with them certain indulgences that could be applied to the Poor Souls in purgatory.

This is not a criticism of Novus Ordo Catholics, nor is it pointing out that it’s an invalid Mass. Many Catholics do not have means to get to a traditional Mass. But it is a critique on the problems with the Rite of the New Mass. Cardinal Ottaviani stated in their critique of the new Mass that it “represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent.” “The accompanying critical study of the Novus Ordo Missae, the work of a group of theologians, liturgists and pastors of souls, shows quite clearly in spite of its brevity that if we consider the innovations implied or taken for granted which may of course be evaluated in different ways, the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The “canons” of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery…It is evident that the Novus Ordo has no intention of presenting the faith as taught by the Council of Trent, to which, nonetheless, the Catholic conscience is bound forever. With the promulgation of the Novus Ordo, the loyal Catholic is thus faced with a most tragic alternative.” (THE OTTAVIANI INTERVENTION (catholictradition.org)

Thanks to the communist infiltrators and the freemasons, this is what we have. Archbishop Annibale Bugnini was the architect of the new Mass. He was suspected for many years to be a freemason. Fr. Charles Murr, who worked with Cardinal Gagnon for some time, recently confirmed that Bugnini was indeed a freemason. Bugnini fabricated a new form of Mass, based on the Lutheran protestant liturgy. A traditional Catholic who converted from Lutheranism said the Novus Ordo was basically a Lutheran service. However, the Lutherans do not have valid Orders and therefore cannot consecrate the bread and wine, whereas a valid Novus Ordo priest can and does. They are saying the Essential words to consecrate, which St. Alphonsus taught were, “This is My body; This is my blood.” which are the very same words Jesus used at the Last Supper. However, St. Alphonsus goes on to say that the other words belong to the Substance of the form, and a priest sins if he changes the words in the Substance. All the Novus Ordo priests are using a form that was illictly changed. Pope St. Pius V, Quo Primum forbade anyone to change the Order of the traditional Mass, and threatened the wrath of Almighty God on anyone who would dare do so. Pope Paul VI changed it, and now Pope Francis, Bergoglio is trying to destroy it! It is true that Our Lord is coming down on the altar and feeding His flock, but the rite itself is very displeasing to him. Back to the warnings.

August 5, 1971: “I ask and I order immediately two things: Let the modern Masses cease at once and let them return to the Canon ordained by the Tridentine Council of Pius V.” Emphasis added. (Here Our Lord is confirming Quo Primum). “Let them return to the primitive sources of the Church, the religious and Christian customs  in seculars and religious; and repent, all of you members of the Hierarchy of My Church, who have apostatized and have been traitors. Repent and return to the good path immediately!.”

     June 22, 1973: “ My most holy Mother at present is nowhere but here on earth, crying with Me and adoring the Eucharist, for all the sacrileges that are made in the Holy Mass and the profanations of the great Sacrament of My love.”   OUR LADY WARNS ABOUT SACRILEGIOUS COMMUNIONS TO FR. STEPHANO GOBBI   https://motherofgodlibrary.org/2023/03/.

     October 29,1974: “Make known, on my behalf, and on behalf of the Divine Trinity in heaven and of the Trinity of earth, that they avoid concelebrations of masses, and the distribution of Communion standing, according to the modern custom. Tell them that I order such profanations prohibited! Let the Holy Mass be in Latin and in the manner that the Council of Trent left if defined forever. Let their services be to atone to My justice, and not to offend it.” TWO BOYS AND ONE COW – MotherofGodlibrary.org/2023/07. Does a father send two boys to milk one cow? Then why two priests to say one Mass?

     Some other considerations: Pope St. Pius V, who codified the traditional Latin Mass, fully realized that the way we worship is the way we believe (lex orandi, lex credenda). This holy Pope, in order to protect forever the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the dogma it embodies, issued in the sixteenth century the papal Bull, Quo Primum. It says in part: “We specifically command each and every Patriarch…be they Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church or possessed of any other rank or preeminence, and we order them by virtue of holy obedience to sing or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm laid down by us, and henceforward to discontinue and utterly discard all other rubrics and rites of other missals, however ancient, which they have been accustomed to follow and not to presume in celebrating Mass to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal.”

     “At no time in the future can a priest, whether secular or order priest, ever be forced to use any other way of saying Mass.  And in order once and for all to preclude any scruples of conscience and fear of ecclesiastical penalties and censures, we declare herewith that it is by virtue of our Apostolic Authority that we decree and prescribe that this present order and decree of ours is to last in perpetuity, and never at a future date can it be revoked or amended legally…And if, nevertheless, anyone would dare attempt any action contrary to this order of ours, handed down for all times, let him know that he has incurred the wrath of Almighty God, and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”

    Pope St. Pius V did not initiate a new Mass; a uniform editing  was undertaken of the Missal and the occasion was used to get rid of certain innovations that had crept in over the centuries. In effect therefore, there is no Tridentine Mass, in the strict sense, because a new order of Mass was not promulgated as a follow-up to the Council of Trent. It was a matter of extending to the Universal Church “that rite of the Mass that all the popes had always said and declared as dating to the Apostolic tradition.” St. Pius V, therefore, “invented” nothing.

      Who could possibly claim that there is not a terrible crisis of faith in the Catholic Church when polls and surveys show that only 15% of Catholics believe that they should always obey Church teaching; when nearly as many Catholics think abortion is permissible as non-Catholics; and when 75% of Catholics disagree with Church teaching forbidding divorce and contraception? Another study revealed that only 30% of Catholics now believe in the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist, and only 50% of priests! “When the Son of man comes, think ye, that he will find faith on earth?” Luke 18:8. Remember Our Lady of Fatima’s warning about the suicide of changing the liturgy!

     The crisis in the Church will continue to worsen until we return to discipline and orthodoxy. The first order in this process is to follow the instructions of Our Lord to Sr. Maria Concepcion Zuniga Lopez as mentioned above. “The Holy Mass must return to the rites that my Spirit has given many centuries ago, by means of My upright Vicars. Let the Holy Mass be in Latin and in the manner which the Council of Trent left if defined forever.” Fr. Chad Ripperger, exorcist, said that “Latin is a sacred language because it was one of the three languages nailed to the cross.” Please pray that our dear Lord will soon send us a true Shepherd to restore fully the true Mass, and the holy traditions of our Church. Or are we in the time spoken of by Daniel, that the holy Sacrifice of the Mass will be taken away 42 months, or three and a half years? “And from the time when the continual sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination unto desolation shall be set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred ninety days.” 12:11. If we deny the faith, we are on the road to hell. Jesus Christ warned, “If he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and the publican.” St. Matthew 18:17. All those of you who have left the faith, you need to come back. All those who are not in the faith, you need to come in. St. Jude said, “ Dearly beloved, taking all care to write unto you concerning your common salvation, I was under a necessity to write unto you: to beseech you to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints.” Verse 3. This faith is the Catholic faith. The Apostles in the Apostle’s Creed said, “I believe in the holy Catholic Church.” They were the ones who actually named the Church – THE MYSTICAL CITY OF GOD.

     While we still can, we should be seeking a traditional Latin Mass. “The new Mass is valid, but not licit.” These are the words of  Fr. Charles Schoenbaechler spoken to me when he was about 95 years of age. This agrees with Fr. Bryan Houghton in his booklet, THE MUDDLE OF THE MASS, wherein he states that the Roman document which came out of Rome on the new Mass did not state in Latin, “force of law,” but he said the translators in the U.S. and other countries he checked with made it say “force of law.” This explains why many good priests and bishops believed they had to say the new Mass, when they read ‘’force of law.” I heard a rumor that Fr. Schoenbaechler considered it a mortal sin to say the new Mass. Considering what he told me, I could understand why. If a man has relations with his wife, they are licit. If he has relations with someone else, they are not, and it’s a mortal sin.

     A former Lutheran, now traditional Catholic, said that the new Mass is basically a Lutheran service. Pope Paul VI, according to Jean Guitton, a close friend, said he wanted  to formulate a Mass pleasing to the protestants. This he did. He eliminated all the prayers at the foot of the altar. You sacrifice on an altar. They changed the Confiteor around, and butchered it,  to where you no longer ask the priest, (who is offering the Sacrifice for you), to pray for you. “And you Father, to pray for me to the Lord our God.” Instead of confessing to the Blessed Mother, St. Michael, St. John and St. Peter and Paul, they now confess to one another.

      Michael Davies said they eliminated the Offertory prayers, because “they all smack of Sacrifice,” and the protestants don’t believe it’s the Sacrifice of Calvary. They rather inserted, “Blessed are you, God of all creation, etc. which are Jewish blessing prayers before a meal. Look up the Ten Commandments’ movie. It’s in there. Just a few lines after the Lord’s Prayer, the Our Father, they inserted, “For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory, now and forever.” That sounds good to the protestants, because that’s how they end the Our Father, which, by the way, is not in the Bible. Yet they tell you they follow the Bible.

        Cardinal Ottaviani, Cardinal Bacci and the other theologians tried to tell Pope Paul VI that it would be “an incalculable error” to introduce the new Mass. But he did so anyway. Suggested reading: THE OTTAVIANI INTERVENTION. For anyone who wants to dispute these things, I invite them to look up the  Index of Leading Catholic Indicators: The Church Since Vatican II – The findings of this survey are staggering. If anyone thinks there is not a crisis in the Church or that it is not the result of Vatican II, let him read these statistics. https://www.olrl.org/new_mass/. We should be attending the traditional Mass whenever possible, even if we have to drive miles to do so.            

MotherofGodlibrary.org

My Little Boy tee shirt https://www.gearbubble.com/mlbts01

Going to work mug: https://www.gearbubble.com/gtwmug78

JOY TRAVEL MUG https://www.gearbubble.com/joytmug79

A GOOD MOTHER TEE SHIRT www.gearbubble.com/mlgts04

JESUS KING OF LOVE SHIRT https://www.gearbubble.com/koltee12

MAN IS BORN TO LABOR https://www.gearbubble.com/labm06

THE ROSARY IS A PRICELESS TREASURE MUG https://www.gearbubble.com/ptreas015