Please pause a minute and pray the Hail Mary before reading: Hail Mary, full of grace. Our Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen
Before we begin, let us review some quotes from the Church forbidding a fabrication of a new Mass: “If anyone says that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church customarily used in the solemn administration of the sacraments may be despised, or may be freely omitted by the ministers without sin, or may be changed into other new rites by any church pastor whomsoever, let him be anathema.” …Council of Trent, Sess. VII, Can. XIII —
– Pope Paul III, 3 March 1547 (D.S. 1613)
Pope Pius VI Speaks Regarding a Liturgy in the Vernacular or in a Loud Voice as offensive, and rash, and favourable to heresy and insulting: “…XXXIII. “The proposition of the Synod, which shows that it wishes to remove those reasons which have partially induced the forgetfulness of the principles relating to the order of the liturgy, “by calling it to a greater simplicity of the rites, by expressing it in the vernacular, and with pronouncing it in a loud voice, as if the current order of the liturgy received and approved by the Church comes in part from the forgetfulness of the principles on which it must be based; …is rash, offensive to pious ears, insulting to the Church, and favourable to the talking of heretics against the Church itself.” – Pope Pius VI, Auctorem Fidei, Aug. 28, 1794 (D.S. 2633)
Thirdly, the Blessed Mother herself to Sr. Lucy of Fatima, according to the words of Pope Pius XII: “I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a Divine Warning against the suicide of altering the faith in her liturgy, her theology, and her soul.”
Fr. Charles Murr, in his book, MURDER IN THE 33RD DEGREE, said that Archbishop Gagnon was commissioned by Pope Paul VI to do an investigation on the freemasons in the heirarchy in Rome. This investigation took him three years, and he confirmed, among many clergy, that Archbishop Annibale Bugnini was a freemason. Why does this matter? Because Archbishop Bugnini was the fabricator of the new Mass, the Novus Ordo. He made a lot of serious changes and omissions he was not allowed to do.
He abolished the prayers at the foot of the altar. Those of you who do not attend the Latin Mass will not know what I’m talking about. He butchered the Confiteor. He abolished all the Offertory Prayers which “smacked of Sacrifice,” as Michael Davies said. He put in the ending the protestant version of the Lord’s prayer to appease the protestants. “For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory, now and forever.”
He abolished the priest in the Confiteor, because the priest is offering the holy Sacrifice of the Mass for us, the invisible and unbloody sacrifice of Calvary for us. We no longer ask the priest to pray for us in the Confiteor, “…and you Father, to pray for us to the Lord our God.” And we no longer confess “to Blessed Mary, ever Virgin…”the sinless Mother of God, whose Son we crucified, but to our brothers and sisters, sinners like ourselves. Why are we confessing to one another? Only the priest can forgive us our sins. He also abolished the Gospel of St. John read at the end of the Latin Mass. Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich, another great mystic and victim soul of the Church, also saw in the future a new church being built, the angels were not taking part in helping with it, and the Gospel of St. John was not read at the end. All these things confirmed that Pope Paul VI, according to Jean Guitton, a close friend, said he wanted to formulate a Mass pleasing to the protestants. This he did.
This article reveals messages received by two privileged souls in regard to the new Mass. The first chosen soul we will deal with in this paper is Marie Julie Jahenny (1850-1941). She may well be one of the greatest mystics and stigmatist women in the history of the Catholic church.
Marie Julie Jahenny, the mystic and stigmatist of La Fraudais, was born on the 122th of February, 1850, in a little village in Britttany (in the west of France), called Blain. The eldest of five children, she was brought up by her simple, good parents in that lively faith for which Britons are renowned. Our Lord favored her with many graces from the time of her First Holy Communion, graces to which she corresponded with ever increasing devotion. She joined the Franciscan Third Order when in her early twenties, to help to sanctify herself in the world. world.
In 1873, she received from heaven that most remarkable mystic gift, the stigmata. From the age of 23 until her death, some 60 years later, she bore in her body the wounds of Our Lord to a more visible degree than had any other stigmatist in the Church’s history. In addition to the five wounds of the Sacred hands, Feet, and Side, Mari Julie suffered the wounds inflicted by the Crown of Thorns and the Cross on Our Lord’s Sacred Head and Shoulder respectively, the wounds of his Scourging, those caused by the ropes with which he was bound, as well as other wounds of a more mystic nature.
Henceforth, Marie Julie lived her life of co-redemptive suffering (as a victim soul), in a little cottage in a little hamlet of La Fraudais, near Blain. She thus fulfilled Our Blessed Lord’s desire for her to make reparation for the sins of France and the world. She was favored with frequent visions of Jesus and Mary, as well as many prophetic lights.
The truth of the heavenly warnings of which she was to be the humble messenger was vindicated by her characteristic simplicity and honesty, her exemplary obedience to her spiritual directors and her Bishop, and of course, by the fulfillment of all she prophesied during her long life. With unfailing accuracy she foretold the two world wars, the election of Pope St. Pius X, the various persecutions of the Church, the chastisements and the fate of apostate France. Much remains to unfold. Her warnings for the last Times should be read by all ‘’who have ears.’’
Marie Julie was the wonder of the many scientists who examined her continually, the scorn of unbelievers, and the proud, the admiration of her lifelong friend, Monsignor Fourier, Bishop of Nantes, and the devoted circle of those who made the diffusion of her messages to an ungrateful and unheeding world their life’s work. She went to her heavenly reward on March 4, 1941.
Blind, deaf, dumb and crippled, she had subsisted miraculously on the Blessed Sacrament alone, for the last many years of her life. Surely then, we will not pass over lightly what God has confided to her for the benefit of our own sad days. Now read Marie Julie’s prophecies concerning the new liturgy:
On November 27, 1902 (Ed. Note: The seventy-second anniversary of the Miraculous Medal apparition [November 27, 1830]), and on May 10, 1904, Our Lord warned of the new liturgy that would one day be instituted. Bear in mind that in 1917, Our Lady of Fatima also, according to Pope Pius XII, warned again about the suicide of changing the liturgy. Jesus said to Julie, “I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of my Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls, a Mass that contains words which are odious in my sight. When the fatal hour arrives where the faith of my priest is put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in this second period. (Note: These disciples who were not of His Gospel were the freemasons. Fr. Gruner said the freemasons back in the 1920’s were already trying to figure out a way to change the Mass. Pope Pius XI said the freemasons were “the Church’s mortal enemy.”)
The first period is the one of My priesthood, existing since Me. The second is the one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of holy religion will impose their formulas in the book of the second celebration. Many of my priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss, Unfortunately, amongst them will be those who will accept it.”
On May 10, 1904 Our Lady describes the new clergy and its liturgy: “They will not stop on this hateful and sacrilegious road. They will go further to compromise all at once, and in one blow, the Holy Church, the clergy, and the faith of my children.” She announces ‘’the dispersion of the pastors” by the Church herself; true pastors, who will be replaced by others formed by Hell: (Freemasons), “…new preachers of new sacraments, new temples, new baptisms, new confraternities.” (Note. See AA 1025, MEMOIRS OF AN ANTI-APOSTLE, and also Bella Dodd, SCHOOL OF DARKNESS, which details the communist infiltration into the seminaries, these pastors “formed by Hell,” she says).
The second chosen soul, whom Our Lord called His Portavoz (messenger) is a Mexican nun who has given universal messages from Our Lord. He commanded her to make these messages known to the whole world. The Portavox was a nun who belonged to the community of Franciscans Minims of the Perpetual Help of Mary, located in the Villa de Guadalupe in Mexico City, near the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The Franciscan Minim nuns were founded in Zamora, Mexico, in 1942, and moved to Mexico City in 1967.
When the messages were first published in 1969, the Portavoz’ identity was kept secret, but it was revealed in 1974. She was the foundress, Maria Concepcion Zuniga Lopez (1914-1979). Since the age of twelve she received revelations from heaven. In 1931 they were investigated and approved by Archbishop Pascual Diaz Barreto, Primate of Mexico, and in 1941 by Bishop Fulcheri.
Here are the messages she received from Our Lord about the traditional Mass: December 21, 1975: “Insist, our little daughter…about this very important point, that the modifications of desacralized worship are the profanation of the Holy, prophesied for these times.”
May 24, 1970: “The Holy Mass must return to the rites that My Spirit has given many centuries ago, by means of My upright Vicars.” (Quo Primum, Pope St. Pius V, forbade the rites to ever be changed, and whosoever would dare do so, ‘’would incur the wrath of Almighty God, and the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul,” he said).
June 7, 1970: “The Canon of the Mass should be said by the priest alone, in silence and in Latin, without diminishing a single iota. The faithful should remain in silence, adoring the Eucharist, which is the ineffable Mystery of My Divine and human love, which you will not be able to understand except in eternity.” Why should the Church insist on Latin in the liturgy? Fr. Chad Ripperger said, “Latin is a sacred language, because it was one of the languages nailed to the cross.”
(Note: MYSTERIUM FIDEI; THE MYSTERY OF FAITH. When Jesus was consecrating the chalice He said, “This is the chalice of my Blood, of the new and eternal testament, the mystery of faith…” Here he refers to the Eucharist as, the ineffable mystery. The mystery of faith is Christ’s real sacramental presence on the altar. That is why, when Pope Paul VI published an encyclical on the Eucharist, it was titled MYSTERIUM FIDEI, MYSTERY OF FAITH). But now in the new Mass, the Novus Ordo, the Mystery of Faith can be any line they want to come up with! Who gave Archbishop Bugnini the authority to take this out of the Consecration formula of the Canon of the Mass?
Also, to add insult to injury, they turned the priest around from facing Our Lord in the tabernacle, to facing the people. They put the priest’s back to Our Lord in the tabernacle to facing the people. “They have turned their backs to me, and not their face,” said Our Lord in Jeremiah, 2:27. The Mass is about the priest offering the Holy Sacrifice to God for our salvation. It’s not about the priest talking to the people. It’s about the priest talking to God. The only time the priest turns around is when he is addressing the people. How rude would it be for someone to turn their back to someone while speaking to them. Yet Jesus is the King, He is the Lord of heaven and earth! How rude, how disrespectful, how irreverent to turn one’s back on him while speaking to Him and His heavenly Father. One good priest, who realized this, told his congregation he was going to turn his back to them while giving the sermon, to demonstrate to them the inappropriateness of turning the priest’s back to God, to Jesus in the tabernacle while saying the Mass.
As if was said earlier, Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich saw a new church being built, and the angels were not assisting in its development. Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano says they are setting up a parallel church. Is this the new church she saw? Moreover, she also said she saw a Mass where the Last Gospel is no longer read. For those who are Novus Ordo Catholics who’ve never been to a traditional Mass, the Last Gospel is always read. But in the new Mass, the Novus Ordo of which we are speaking, the Last Gospel has been purged like so many other things. Plus, the Leonine Prayers prayed at the end of the Low Masses for the conversion of Russia were also omitted. As if we no longer need to pray for the conversion of Russia. Plus, the prayers carried with them certain indulgences that could be applied to the Poor Souls in purgatory.
This is not a criticism of Novus Ordo Catholics who attend the new Mass. Nor is it even a criticism of the clergy who say it. Nor is it pointing out that it’s an invalid Mass. Many Catholics do not have means to get to a traditional Mass. But it is a critique on the problems with the Rite of the New Mass. Cardinal Ottaviani stated in their critique of the new Mass that it “represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent.” “The accompanying critical study of the Novus Ordo Missae, the work of a group of theologians, liturgists and pastors of souls, shows quite clearly in spite of its brevity that if we consider the innovations implied or taken for granted which may of course be evaluated in different ways, the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The “canons” of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery…It is evident that the Novus Ordo has no intention of presenting the faith as taught by the Council of Trent, to which, nonetheless, the Catholic conscience is bound forever. With the promulgation of the Novus Ordo, the loyal Catholic is thus faced with a most tragic alternative.” (THE OTTAVIANI INTERVENTION (catholictradition.org) Note these last words: “It is evident that the Novus Ordo has no intention of presenting the faith as taught by the Council of Trent.”
Thanks to the communist infiltrators and the freemasons, this is what we have. Pope Pius XI said of the freemasons: “They are our mortal enemy.” Pope Leo XIII said they were of “the synagogue of Satan.” Archbishop Annibale Bugnini was the architect of the new Mass. He was suspected for many years to be a freemason. As was stated earlier, Fr. Charles Murr, who worked with Cardinal Gagnon for some time, recently confirmed that Bugnini was indeed a freemason, in his book, MURDER IN THE 33RD DEGREE, and also on several podcasts.
Bugnini fabricated a new form of Mass, based on the Lutheran protestant liturgy. A traditional Catholic who converted from Lutheranism said the Novus Ordo was basically a Lutheran service. However, the Lutherans do not have valid Orders and therefore cannot consecrate the bread and wine, whereas a valid Novus Ordo priest can and does. They are saying the “Essential words” to consecrate, which St. Alphonsus taught were, “This is My body; This is my blood.” which are the very same words Jesus used at the Last Supper. However, St. Alphonsus goes on to say that the other words belong to the Substance of the form, and a priest sins if he changes the words in the Substance. Some people argue that if any of the words at all are changed, it invalidates the consecration. However, would anyone argue that when Jesus spoke those very words at the Last Supper, He did not effect the consecration? Surely not. St. Leonard of Port Maurice in his book on the Mass, THE HIDDEN TREASURE, said that Jesus himself is consecrating in the priest, because the priest is called Alter Christus, another Christ. So if Christ himself is consecrating in the priest by means of his Holy Orders, how could anyone argue that St. Alphonsus” teaching on this matter is incorrect?
However, the Novus Ordo priests are using a form that was illictly changed. For one thing, Bugnini had no authority to change the form, yet he did. Pope St. Pius V, Quo Primum forbade anyone to change the Order of the traditional Mass, and threatened the wrath of Almighty God on anyone who would dare do so. Pope Paul VI allowed Bugnini to change it, and now Pope Francis, Bergoglio is trying to destroy it! It is true that Our Lord is coming down on the altar and feeding His flock, but the rite itself is very deficient and displeasing to him. Therefore Reverend Fathers, when you are offering the Novus Ordo Mass, consider that you are saying the prayers of a Freemason, an unlawful, illicit Mass; a Mass condemned by Cardinal Ottavianni; the suicidal liturgy that Monsignor Pacelli, later Pope Pius XII said Our Lady of Fatima warned about; and a Mass contradicting the true Mass of the centuries, codified by Pope St. Pius V with the strongest censure that none ever dare change it. How does that make you feel? “And if, nevertheless, anyone would dare attempt any action contrary to this order of ours, handed down for all times, let him know that he has incurred the wrath of Almighty God, and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.” – Pope St. Pius V, Quo Primum. As Dr. Taylor Marshall said, “I would rather say the prayers of the saints and Doctors of the Church than the prayers of a Freemason.” See Fr. Nicholas Gruner’s talk about the importance of the Fatima message, and the warnings regarding the new Mass, and the Liturgical revolution: https://tinyurl.com/4xwfhrxf. You are highly encouraged to hear this talk by Fr. Nicholas Gruner.
Back to the warnings.
August 5, 1971: Our Lord to his Portovoz: “I ask and I order immediately two things: Let the modern Masses cease at once and let them return to the Canon ordained by the Tridentine Council of Pius V.” Emphasis added. (Here Our Lord is confirming Quo Primum). “Let them return to the primitive sources of the Church, the religious and Christian customs in seculars and religious; and repent, all of you members of the Hierarchy of My Church, who have apostatized and have been traitors. Repent and return to the good path immediately!.”
June 22, 1973: “ My most holy Mother at present is nowhere but here on earth, crying with Me and adoring the Eucharist, for all the sacrileges that are made in the Holy Mass and the profanations of the great Sacrament of My love.” OUR LADY WARNS ABOUT SACRILEGIOUS COMMUNIONS TO FR. STEPHANO GOBBI https://motherofGodlibrary.org/2023/03/. The Blessed Mother also complains about the sacrilegious Communions to Venerable Mary of Agreda, Spain in THE MYSTICAL CITY OF GOD, and reveals the great evil and insults the sinner gives to Jesus and also to His Mother by despising and taking the Holy Eucharist unworthily.
Jesus continues, October 29,1974: “Make known, on my behalf, and on behalf of the Divine Trinity in heaven and of the Trinity of earth, that they avoid concelebrations of masses, and the distribution of Communion standing, according to the modern custom. Tell them that I order such profanations prohibited! Let the Holy Mass be in Latin and in the manner that the Council of Trent left if defined forever. Let their services be to atone to My justice, and not to offend it.” Concelebrations? – TWO BOYS AND ONE COW – MotherofGodlibrary.org/2023/07. Does a father send two boys to milk one cow or one boy to milk one cow? Or two boys to milk two cows? Then why two priests to say one Mass? You don’t get the value and the graces of two Masses.
We should bear in mind here what Father Paul of Moll said about the number of Masses. He said, “The more Masses that are said, the more the devil is blinded…” When you have the clergy celebrating two, three, four or five together celebrating one Mass, that’s only one Mass. So if five clergy concelebrate one Mass on a holiday or something, the Church and souls are losing the value of four Masses. Now consider if this is being done all over the world in many places, imagine how many graces the souls in the Church are losing. Venerable Bede said, concerning priests who omit to say Mass when they can, “A priest who without an important reason omits to say Mass robs the Blessed Trinity of glory, the angels of joy, sinners of pardon, the just of divine assistance, and the souls in purgatory of refreshment, the Church of a benefit, and himself of a medicine.” Some clergy, when a little snowflake falls, or even a big snow, when they are in residence right by the church, will not even say a daily Mass. “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” “To him that knoweth to do good, and doth it not, it is sin.” St. James 4:17. No wonder the Church is falling apart!
Some other considerations: Pope St. Pius V, who codified the traditional Latin Mass, fully realized that the way we worship is the way we believe (lex orandi, lex credenda). This holy Pope, in order to protect forever the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the dogma it embodies, issued in the sixteenth century the papal Bull, Quo Primum. It says in part: “We specifically command each and every Patriarch…be they Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church or possessed of any other rank or preeminence, and we order them by virtue of holy obedience to sing or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm laid down by us, and henceforward to discontinue and utterly discard all other rubrics and rites of other missals, however ancient, which they have been accustomed to follow and not to presume in celebrating Mass to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal.”
Here it is. The bishops, according to this decree, do not have the right to forbid any priest saying the traditional Latin Mass. “At no time in the future can a priest, whether secular or order priest, ever be forced to use any other way of saying Mass. And in order once and for all to preclude any scruples of conscience and fear of ecclesiastical penalties and censures, we declare herewith that it is by virtue of our Apostolic Authority that we decree and prescribe that this present order and decree of ours is to last in perpetuity, and never at a future date can it be revoked or amended legally…And if, nevertheless, anyone would dare attempt any action contrary to this order of ours, handed down for all times, let him know that he has incurred the wrath of Almighty God, and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.” “ In perpetuity, and never at a future date can it be revoked or amended legally…” But now, what do we see? Bishops ordering their clergy to stop saying the Immemorial Mass and say the faulty Novus Ordo.
Pope St. Pius V did not initiate a new Mass; a uniform editing was undertaken of the Missal and the occasion was used to get rid of certain innovations that had crept in over the centuries. In effect therefore, there is no Tridentine Mass, in the strict sense, because a new order of Mass was not promulgated as a follow-up to the Council of Trent. It was a matter of extending to the Universal Church “that rite of the Mass that all the popes had always said and declared as dating to the Apostolic tradition.” St. Pius V, therefore, “invented” nothing.
Who could possibly claim that there is not a terrible crisis of faith in the Catholic Church when polls and surveys show that only 15% of Catholics believe that they should always obey Church teaching; when nearly as many Catholics think abortion is permissible as non-Catholics; and when 75% of Catholics disagree with Church teaching forbidding divorce and contraception? Another study revealed that only 30% of Catholics now believe in the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist, and only 50% of priests! “When the Son of man comes, think ye, that he will find faith on earth?” Luke 18:8. As Fr. Gruner noted in his talk, why are so many Catholic churches now being sold? Because Catholics are no longer going to Mass. Remember Our Lady of Fatima’s warning about the suicide of changing the liturgy! One of the Cardinals who had read the 3rd Secret said it spoke of a great apostasy in the Church. And here it is. Pope Benedict XVI also said to a reporter when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, in reference to the 3rd Secret, “It concerns dangers to the faith, and the life of the Christian.”
The crisis in the Church will continue to worsen until we return to discipline and orthodoxy. The first order in this process is to follow the instructions of Our Lord to Sr. Maria Concepcion Zuniga Lopez as mentioned above. “The Holy Mass must return to the rites that my Spirit has given many centuries ago, by means of My upright Vicars. Let the Holy Mass be in Latin and in the manner which the Council of Trent left if defined forever.” Fr. Chad Ripperger, exorcist, said that “Latin is a sacred language because it was one of the three languages nailed to the cross.”
Please pray that our dear Lord will soon send us a true Shepherd to restore fully the true Mass, and the holy traditions of our Church. Or coud we be in the time spoken of by Daniel, that the holy Sacrifice of the Mass will be taken away 42 months, or three and a half years? “And from the time when the continual sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination unto desolation shall be set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred ninety days.” 12:11.
If we deny the faith, we are on the road to hell. Jesus Christ warned, “He that believeth not, shall be condemned.” And, “If he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and the publican.” St. Matthew 18:17. All those of you who have left the faith, you need to come back. All those who are not in the faith, you need to come in. St. Jude said, “ Dearly beloved, taking all care to write unto you concerning your common salvation, I was under a necessity to write unto you: to beseech you to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints.” Verse 3. This faith is the Catholic faith. The Apostles in the Apostle’s Creed said, “I believe in the holy Catholic Church.” They were the ones who actually named the Church – THE MYSTICAL CITY OF GOD.
While we still can, we should be seeking a traditional Latin Mass. What did Fr. Charles Schoenbaechler say about the new Mass? He said, “The new Mass is valid, but not licit.” These are the words of Fr. Charles Schoenbaechler spoken to me when he was about 95 years of age. This agrees with Fr. Bryan Houghton in his booklet, THE MUDDLE OF THE MASS, wherein he states that the Roman document, Missale Romanum I believe it was, which came out of Rome on the new Mass did not state in Latin, “force of law,” but he said the translators in the U.S. and other countries he checked with made it say “force of law.” This explains why many good priests and bishops believed they had to say the new Mass, when they read ‘’force of law.” There was a rumor that Fr. Charles Schoenbaechler considered it a mortal sin to say the new Mass. Considering what he told me, I could understand why. If a man has relations with his wife, they are licit. If he has relations with someone else, they are not, and it’s a mortal sin. So if it doesn’t have the force of law, how can it be licit, and how can any priest be justified saying it by order of his bishop? We are supposed to obey our Superiors in all things except sin. But how can a bishop lawfully order his clergy to say the new Mass? According to Pope St. Pius V, he can’t.
A former Lutheran, now traditional Catholic, said that the new Mass is basically a Lutheran service. Pope Paul VI, according to Jean Guitton, a close friend, said he wanted to formulate a Mass pleasing to the protestants. This he did. He eliminated all the prayers at the foot of the altar, as was stated previously. You sacrifice on an altar.
Paul VI allowed Bugnini to take the priest out of the Confiteor who offers the sacrifice of the Mass for our sins, and he allowed him to take the Blessed Mother out of the beginning of the Confiteor! We no longer say, “I confess to Almighty God and to Blessed Mary ever virgin…” whose Son we crucified, but, “I confess to almighty God, and to you, my brothers and sisters, ” who crucified her Son. Why the change? Why are we confessing to one another? We no longer acknowledge St. Michael the Archangel (Lucifer is pretty happy about that), nor St. John the Baptist, St. Peter nor St. Paul.
This butcher, Freemason Bugnini, changed the Confiteor around, and butchered it, to where you no longer ask the priest, (who is offering the Sacrifice for you), to pray for you. “And you Father, to pray for me to the Lord our God.” But instead Bugnini removed the priest and inserted the people. It is good to receive the prayers of others, but the priest is offering the Sacrifice of the Mass which has infinite value. Instead of confessing to the Blessed Mother, St. Michael, St. John and St. Peter and Paul, they now confess to one another. Do you not see the watering down of the prayers? Reverend Fathers and faithful, how does that make you feel knowing that the Confiteor that you’re saying was composed by a freemason?
Michael Davies said they eliminated the Offertory prayers, because “they all smack of Sacrifice,” and the protestants don’t believe it’s the Sacrifice of Calvary. They don’t believe in a sacrificing priest. That’s why Bugnini took the priest out of the Confiteor! They rather inserted, “Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, etc. which are Jewish blessing prayers before a meal. Look up the Ten Commandments’ movie. It’s in there. Just a few lines after the Lord’s Prayer, the Our Father, they inserted, “For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory, now and forever.” That sounds good to the protestants, because that’s how they end the Our Father, which, by the way, is not in the Bible. Yet they tell you they follow the Bible.
Cardinal Ottaviani, Cardinal Bacci and the other theologians tried to tell Pope Paul VI that it would be “an incalculable error” to introduce the new Mass. But he did so anyway. And it has been a disaster. Why do you think Our Lady of Fatima said to reveal the 3rd Secret of Fatima in 1960? “Because it would be clearer then,” said Sr. Lucy. Suggested reading: THE OTTAVIANI INTERVENTION. For anyone who wants to dispute these things, I invite them to look up the Index of Leading Catholic Indicators: The Church Since Vatican II – The findings of this survey are staggering. Father Edward Schillebeeckx, one of the periti at Vatican II said, “We have deliberately used ambiguous language, and we know how we shall interpret it hereafter. ” -From Catholic Family News, when John Vennari, R.I.P., was still printing it.
If anyone thinks there is not a crisis in the Church or that it is not the result of Vatican II, let him read these statistics. The Church, in Canon Law, provides Supplied Jurisdiction in times of crisis, which means sometimes a priest may have to take extraordinary action for the good of souls which in normal times would not be lawful. This is what Archbishop Lefebrve was operating under at the time of his supposed excommunication. However, high Canon lawyers, even in Rome, who studied the case, said that what he did was not an act of schism, and therefore the excommunication was null and void – not valid. When the Hawaiian bishop excommunicated some Catholics there in the 90″s for going to the SSPX chapels, they took their case to Rome, and Cardinal Ratzinger ruled against the bishop, saying he did not have the right to excommunicate them. To inform yourself on the new Mass, I suggest you visit this site: https://www.olrl.org/category/contemporary-topics/the-new-mass/ or https://tinyurl.com/2k9a4f4t.
We should be attending the traditional Mass whenever possible, even if we have to drive miles to do so. When you go to a Novus Ordo, where they give Communion in the hand, Fr. Gruner said people are supposed to look in their hands for Sacred Particles, because the Church teaches, if those Particles are visible, that the Body of Christ is there, but if people are not looking in their hands for Particles and they fall out of the hands onto the floor, then Jesus finds himself trodden underfoot literally by those following. “Have mercy on me, O God, for man has trodden me underfoot.” Psalm 55:2; drbo.org. How many times have you trodden Our Lord underfoot from following others who take Communion in the hand? How does that make you feel? Bishop Athanasius Schneider has stated, “The most grievous aspect of Communion in the hand is that Particles of the Host stick on the palms, or fingers. And then they fall down…Our Lord is trampled by His faithful in numerous churches. And we continue quietly, and no one shouts!” If you are taking Communion in the hand, you are following the communist infiltrator’s tactic to tear down reverence and faith to Jesus in the Most Blessed Sacrament! I suggest you read the book, AA 1025, MEMOIRS OF AN ANTI-APOSTLE. Regarding the notes he was keeping, Communion in the hand and many other abuses are in the new Mass. We should never take Communion in the hand except for some real emergency or in time of persecution. The Blessed Mother has shown her disapproval of Communion in the hand. See the first article here: MotherofGodlibrary.org
OUR LADY WARNS ABOUT SACRILEGIOUS COMMUNIONS TO FR. STEPHANO GOBBI MotherofGodlibrary.org/2023/03
Communion forbidden in the hand quotes by Popes and Councils – MotherofGodlibrary.org
WOMAN DAMNED TO HELL FOR THE SIN OF IMMODESTY – MotherofGodlibrary.org
OUTRAGES, SACRILEGES, AND INDIFFERENCE! – MotherofGodlibrary.org
“The Fewness of the Saved” – by St. Leonard of Port Maurice – YouTube
Our Blessed Mother has asked us to pray much for priests. Some of the mystics such as Sr. Josepha Menendez and Sr. Elana Aiello were shown the loss of priest’s and bishop’s souls in hell. St. Leonard in his COUNSELS TO CONFESSORS relates the story of a priest’s soul damned because he would routinely absolve an adulterer without making him give up his sin. This is often seen in the Novus Ordo parishes where the clergy routinely give Holy Communion to immodest women all the time with no correction whatsoever. I find this unfathom- able to understand how the clergy can risk their eternal damnation on such a grave matter because they are afraid of a little persecution or money not going into the basket. “Woe to you when men bless you,” said Our Lord. Our Lady at Garabandal warned in 1965, “Many cardinals, many bishops, and many priests are on the road to perdition, and are taking many souls with them.” We can no longer follow blindly our clergy. We must pray much for our priests. They are our spiritual Fathers. Will not a good son pray for his father? No doubt I will be criticized for what I have said here, but Monsignor Escriva said, “We are not like a dollar bill. We cannot please everyone.” I do not ask you to take my word for it, (Actually I prefer you don’t), but do your own homework. Posted Larry Wethington