In the early 1900’s, Communists began to send young agents into Catholic seminaries, in order to infiltrate the Church. The idea was that these corrupted priests would, in turn, corrupt the Church from within, in matters of both faith and morals.
One such infiltrator, who throughout the course of this document he shall be referred to as AA-1025, his Communist Agent Identification Number, was born around 1917, the year of the great Miracle of Fatima. This tragic man ran away from home at the age of fourteen. He entered the seminary, as a double agent, sometime between 1935 and 1940. Under orders from his Marxist superiors, he murdered a priest who had the charism of discerning vocations, because this priest understood what he was, and would have reported him. Employing his knowledge of karate, he dispatched him with two swift gestures, leaving no marks, as if he died from heart failure. [See page 38].
The title AA-1025, as it refers to “seminary student 1025,” demonstrates the sickeningly large number of infiltrators already activated in under cover operations by the 1930’s. Bella Dodd, once a Communist party operative, admitted that she alone was responsible for recruiting a thousand young radicals for seminary studies before her conversion to Catholicism. According to a widely reported story, Mrs. Dodd became acquainted with Fulton Sheen before he became bishop, and by his instrumentality she was converted.
It is anyone’s guess as to how many men entered into the seminaries of the Church, under false pretenses, during this period of strenuous activism. Contemplating this debacle, one can easily conclude why the Church has undergone such dramatic and ravaging changes since 1960. In fact, 1960 is the very year announced by Our Lady of Fatima wherein Her warnings to the world be more clearly understood. This was because the 3rd Secret of Fatima was supposed to be revealed by the pope in 1960, according to the Blessed Mother’s own instructions, which were disregarded by Pope John XXIII. Why 1960, they asked Sister Lucy, and she replied, “It will be clearer then.” The Third Secret was a warning, and a prophecy. Malachi Martin, who had read the Third Secret, under the promise that he would not reveal its contents, said, “It would bring millions of Catholics back to confession.”
The purpose of this treatment is to expose the erroneous ideas which were injected into the studies of the seminarians by the bad influence of these infiltrators; and to make the public aware of the fact that the Church’s structures and public acts of worship are now totally imbued with this foreign and anti-Catholic ideology. The false ideas are easily recognizable, especially in the essence of the new “Mass”, the “Mass” of the vernacular.
Pope Pius XII once said, “The day the Church abandons Her universal tongue will be the day before She returns to the catacombs.” He also stated when he was still a Monsignor, Monsignor Pacelli, that he was worried about the Virgin Mary’s warning at Fatima about the suicide of changing the liturgy. Fr. Nicholas Gruner, R.I.P., renowned Fatima expert said, “It must be in the 3rd Secret, since it was not in any of the other Fatima revelations.” Just as the Catholic Faith is a “unity of Faith,” so the Roman Rite of Mass is a “unity of worship.” Before the Revolution in the structure of the Church, the faithful could attend Holy Mass anywhere in the world and feel right at home because the Mass was celebrated identically throughout the world, unless the people already had a liturgy 200 years old. The Latin language was universally employed, reversing, in a sense, the punishment of Babel. In fact, with the advent of the evil of the “vernacular Mass,” the punishment of the confusion of tongues, and the destruction of the unity of both faith and worship, is once again upon the world, as a curse from God.
Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, along with other theologians who attempted to intervene to prevent the destruction of the Roman Rite, said, “Since unity of worship has been shattered once and for all, what basis will exist for the unity of faith which accompanied it, and which, we are told, was always to be defended without compromise?”
Before he was elevated to the papacy, Pius XII, as I said, stated that he was worried about Our Lady’s messages to Sr. Lucia, and the suicide of changing the liturgy. He said, “I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers that menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in her liturgy, her theology, her soul . . .” A divine warning, he calls it. (Taken from Fr. Paul Kramer’s Devil’s final Battle, p. 34.)
During the 1960’s, Cardinal Ottaviani and others issued warnings condemning the theology of the new “Mass.” He affirmed that the new “Mass” “represents a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session 22 of the Council of Trent.” (Ottaviani Intervention, p. 27).
Quoting Mgr. Ira Bourassa, from Canada, who read the Memoir of an Anti-Apostle three times: “I believe it my duty to invite all Catholics to read this book, if they wish to understand clearly what the Holy Father, Pope Paul VI, wishes to say when he puts Catholics on guard against the auto-demolition of the Church, that is to say, its destruction from within.”
The anti-apostle says, “It would do some good that a prophecy be sent throughout the world that would be the following: ‘Someday you will see married priests and Mass said in the vernacular tongues.” He said this in 1938. (Devil’s Final Battle, p. 35). Already the Mass in the vernacular is a detestable reality, women priests are clamored for, and “altar girls” have invaded the Holy Sanctuary.
At Rome, Mgr. Bourassa had certain enlightening conversations with a priest/professor who belonged to the Communist network. This miscreant refused to pronounce the words of consecration at Mass, but uttered something similar, in order to avoid making a valid consecration of the bread and wine. Preventing transubstantiation by invalid form and malicious intention, he caused the people to unknowingly adore nothing but bread. This infidel also bore a great hatred for the cassock.
Bourassa quotes the evil man: “Imagine this city without a single cassock, without a single religious costume, masculine or feminine . . . and I swore to myself that it would disappear from our streets and even our churches, because one can easily say Mass in just his coat.” How often do you now see a priest in a cassock? Incidentally, a priest in Evansville, Indiana, some years ago did precisely this! He said Mass in his coat!
The evil professor correctly “prophesied” the suppression of Latin, of priestly vestments, of statues and images, of candles, of crucifixes, of kneelers. (Devil’s Final Battle, p. 59). He predicted the disappearance of altars, and their replacement by bare tables. Furthermore, he labored for the suppression of the Sign of the Cross and genuflections, which he referred to as “ridiculous customs.” In fact the altars of the Church have been replaced by bare tables, bereft of the crucifix, in order to destroy the symbolism of the representation of the holy Sacrifice of Calvary.
This anti-religious priest, like his thousands of comrades, promoted an open war against the pope, and a spirit of contradiction, despising Peter’s God-given authority. Today, many faithful and religious, and even bishops and priests, no longer obey the Holy See, but give only lip service. The Communists wished to promote remarriage of divorcees, polygamy, contraception, and euthanasia. (Memoir, p. 60). The professor worked to suppress devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary, Her image, medals, and so forth.
“The Rosary,” he said, “which professes to honor fifteen so-called mysteries, must be vigorously destroyed. It is capable of maintaining and propagating the faith in a Triune God. (Memoir, p. 81). And this from a communist! How right he was! The Blessed Virgin, in her rosary promises, says it will overcome heresy. Now the fifteen mysteries were given to us directly from heaven through the Blessed Mother to St. Dominic in 1216. They correspond to the 150 Psalms of David. Also, the 153 Hail Mary’s in the entire Rosary correspond to the 153 fish caught after the Resurrection. (John 21:11). The fifteen mysteries were also summarized in St. John’s Gospel: “He came unto His own,” (the Joyful Mysteries), “His own received Him not,” (the Sorrowful Mysteries), “but to all who did receive Him, He gave them power to be made the sons of God,” (the Glorious Mysteries). (John 1:11-12).
Once, the secret agent, about whom the Memoir is written, fell in love with a lady who wore the Miraculous Medal. His Communist chief told him, “Beware! All that is said about that medal is true. If you have it in your room you are in danger.” He wrote about the experience, “That my old professor, an ardent Communist, could speak in such a manner worried me greatly. For the first time in my life, I had doubts about the success of my mission.” (Memoir, p. 82). In fact, the agent placed the medal in his chief’s room. By the next Saturday, the chief had moved away.
The Communists labored to eradicate certain words from the human vocabulary. As a testimony to the success of their infiltration, the New American Bible totally omits the words “soul” and “hell.” The word “charity” has been replaced with the word “love.” Work was begun on a new Catechism which could properly be referred to as the “Catechism of the Religion of Man.” The Communists pushed for the rehabilitation, then the beatification, and even the canonization of the greatest heretics, such as Martin Luther. (Memoir pp. 92-93). And now, Pope Francis is calling honor to Martin Luther, an arch-heretic, who drew millions out of the Church, and according to Sister Maria Serafina Micheli (1849-1911), saw Luther in Hell, https://motherofgodlibrary.org/2019/06/05/a-terrible-vision-luther-in-hell/.
In recent years have we not seen Luther praised and exalted, even in the Church? Compare this sound of tinkling brass with the words of St. Edmund Campion, who wrote to his own apostate bishop to warn him of the fate that awaited him: that he would burn in hell with Judas, Luther, and Zwingli. (Fr. C. Williamson, Letters From the Saints, 1958).
The anti-Apostle of the Memoir preached always that the goodness of God far surpasses every offense. This prototype led the way for the army of lukewarm priests who are forever telling the faithful about God’s mercy, without also speaking to His justice. This writer had the most unfortunate experience of listening to a priest from the diocese of Owensboro, Kentucky tell the congregation that God loved even the damned because He was a “God of love.” Compare the words of St. Alphonsus Ligouri who taught that God hates sinners because their will is united to their sin. He provides Scriptural references as the basis for this teaching, including Psalm 5:7, Thou hatest all the workers of iniquity.”
AA-1025 attempted to destroy belief in Adam and Eve. Many now no longer hold the Scriptures to be the true and literal Word of God. He wished to see the Church sing the praises of souls on non-Christian religions as if they were holy without Christ, to see the Sacrament of Confirmation be administered by priests rather than bishops, to see the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass replaced by a “community ceremony,” to see Extreme Unction referred to as the “Anointing of the sick,” to be dispensed even in the case of a light illness. He worked against the indissolubility of marriage, affirming that the child would be better off as a ward of the state.
He wished to attack the Doctrine of the Holy Eucharist and do away with the term “Real Presence,” and to substitute the word “Mass” with the terms “Lord’s Supper” and “Eucharist.” He wished the see the priest abandon the high altar and replace it with a table, completely bare, and facing the people. (pp. 108-109). Do we see any of these things?
All these ideas of the Communists have been realized in the Novus Ordo “Mass.” Turning the priest around and putting his back to the Tabernacle verifies the words of Jeremias 2:27: They have turned their backs to me, and not their face. In ritual that correctly conforms to the true theology of the Mass, the priest faces the altar and Tabernacle. He faces God, the object of this sacrifice and adoration, and the people fall behind him, because he is their mediator with God. He is leading them to God.
The infiltrators also wished to lay greater stress on the Scriptures, not out of a holy love for the infallible Word of God, but to denigrate the Sacramental reality of the Church instituted by Christ. This is in accord with the malicious plan to create ambiguity in terms, one cause of the proliferation of heterodox Scriptural exegesis. Edward Schillebeeckx, a “periti” at the Second Vatican Council, admitted that the authors of the Council documents had used deliberately ambiguous language, saying, “We know how we shall interpret them hereafter.”
In the Memoirs, with regard to the changes imposed upon the Church after the Council, the infiltrator wrote: “To further weaken belief in the real presence, no more costly embroidered vestments; no more sacred music, especially Gregorian chant, but music in a jazz style; no more Sign of the Cross; no more genuflections, but only dignified and stern attitudes. Moreover, the faithful will have to break themselves of the habit of kneeling, and this will be absolutely forbidden when receiving Communion. Very soon, the Host will be laid in the hand in order that the notion of the sacred be erased. (pp. 110-111). Well? What do we see now?
It will not be a bad thing to allow certain persons to receive Communion under the two species, as priests do . . . In order to destroy all sacredness in the worship, the priest will be invited to say the whole Mass in the vernacular and especially to recite the words of Consecration as a narrative . . . He must not, above all, pronounce the following words, This is My Body, This is My Blood as if he really took the place of Christ who pronounced them.” (Ibid).
St. Alphonsus taught that the “essential” words to consecrate bread and wine into Christ’s real Body and Blood were, “This is My Body – This is My Blood.” The Communists understand this, and attempt to invalidate consecrations by removing the reality of the priest as an alter Christus.
It is quite shocking to see how many of these ideas the Communists were able to successfully implement. In the new “Mass” the vestments are plain and not traditional. Gregorian chant has been suppressed. All but three of the genuflections of the Roman Rite have been eliminated. In fact there is no longer a genuflection before the Elevation of the Sacred Host. Fr. Wickens once said that Novus Ordo priests no longer fear God. Think about it. One of the greatest graces a Catholic could receive is a vision of Our Lord. Many saints were blessed with this experience. The first instinct of any sane person of faith, realizing that their Lord and God had come to them in a special way, would be to immediately kneel before the sight of Him.
This is why the Church, for centuries, directed the clergy to genuflect at the Consecration, just before the Elevation. What more real way could Jesus Christ come to His minister and His people than in His own human and divine Substance? When the Angel of Fatima brought Holy Communion to the children during the vision of 1916, He left It suspended in the air and knelt down with his face to the ground. Furthermore, the Angel taught the children a prayer in reparation for the “outrages, sacrileges, and indifferences by which God is offended,” and told them to “pray thus.”
This they did. In fact, the three children often prayed for long periods of time with their faces to the ground. These divine instructions are backed up by Scripture. Ecclesiasticus 50:19 says: Then all the people made haste, and fell down to the ground upon their faces, to adore the Lord their God, and to pray to the Almighty God, the Most High.”
The instruction in the Novus Ordo “Mass book” #233 says that one is to genuflect when entering and leaving church, and each time when passing before the Blessed Sacrament in the Tabernacle. Pope John Paul II, in the encyclical Inaestimabile Donum, numbers 26 and 27, taught that the proper, traditional genuflection is to be retained, and that if anything is at variance with this, it must be corrected.
However, in the Novus Ordo establishment there is widespread disobedience to this and other directives. Many clergy and laymen pass before their King and Lord with nary a spastic knee-jerk, curt bow, or slight nod of head. Some give no honor or recognizance to Him at all! None of these nominal gestures fulfills the mandate of Pope John Paul. The Venerable Holtzhauser warned of this laxity and disobedience in the Church in what he calls the “fifth period of the Church.”
“During this unhappy period there will be laxity in divine and human precepts. Discipline will suffer. The Holy Canons will be completely disregarded, and the clergy will not respect the laws of the Church . . .” (Catholic Prophecy, pp. 38-39, 46.1, 46.6). Yet these decrees on liturgical discipline are to be observed in the Church. See Acts 15:41: And he (St. Paul) went through Syria and Cilicia, confirming the churches, commanding them to keep the precepts of the Apostles and the Ancients.” See also Acts 16:4.
One cannot sufficiently deplore the outrageous treatment Our Lord is receiving in the Most Blessed Sacrament! The Angel at Fatima told the children to receive the Body and Blood of Our Lord Who is “horribly outraged by the sins of ungrateful men.” Woe to the clergy of the Church, who by their sins and bad example are greatly offending God, and causing countless sins in the laity. Woe to the pastors, that destroy and tear the sheep of my pasture, saith the Lord. Jer. 23:1. Who can understand sins? from my secret ones cleanse me, O Lord: and from those of others spare Thy servant. Ps. 18:13.
What are these “sins of others?” “They are,” says St. Anthony Mary Claret, “those we cause others to commit.” (The Golden Key to Heaven, p. 118); and also, those which others commit that we should correct, yet do not. Not only will the lax priest have to answer for his own sins, but for thousands and thousands of sins committed by others, who he caused to fall by failure of correction. For a bad bishop the number could rise to several million because he has so many people in his diocese that are be lax like him, and who will sin hundreds of times a year because they are not corrected. Is it any wonder, then, that St. John Chrysostom reportedly said that most of the clergy are damned?
AA-1025 wished to see the Blessed Sacrament attacked indirectly, and by various means, so that people would not rebel: for instance, to reform the words of the Mass; to use the term “Lord’s Supper” or “Eucharist” instead of the word Mass in order to minimize the reality of Transubstantiation; to abandon the high altar and replace it with a bare table (no crucifix or other reminder of the sacrifice of Calvary); with the priest facing the nave instead of Almighty God. How ironic that the Mass is the perfect Sacrifice to God, yet in the novus ordo the priest attempts to offer Sacrifice with his back turned towards the One to Whom he offers. How outrageous! They have turned their backs to ME, and not their face. Jer. 2:27.
The imposter also wished to shorten the table in order to “emphasize the Word of God.” He wrote, “It is well known that Catholics are shockingly ignorant of the Bible, so that this modification of the Mass will appear justifiable to them. Very often they will understand nothing, but it is not necessary for them to understand, at least until truly Socialist priests will have been trained.” (108-109).
The Communists worked to get the prayers of the Mass changed. Instead of the traditional Offertory, the novus ordo rubrics employ several different offertories, all grossly inferior to the Roman Rite. AA-1025 wrote in his memoir that he would like the offertory prayer to read like this: “We bring here this bread made by the hand of man and which serves as food for men.” The novus ordo version is not too far off the mark: Blessed are You [sic} Lord God of all creation, through Your [sic] goodness we have this bread to offer, which earth has given and human hands have made . . .”
Obviously the Communist ideal is firmly embedded in the rubrics of the new “Mass.” This should greatly disturb any priest who says the new “Mass,” and should stimulate him to return to the traditional and official Rite of the Church. Laymen should do likewise.
Now, the objection will be, “The pope has told us to say the new Mass”. Yet, as Fr. Bryan Houghton points out in his book, “The Muddle of the Mss,” the original promulgating document, written at Rome in Latin, does not carry the force of law. It only says “force of law” in translations. The original texts says, “to sum up and draw a conclusion,” and not, “to give the force of law.” (p. 6).
Most disturbing is the mistranslation of the words of Consecration, “for you and for many,” as “for you and for all.” One novus ordo priest told me, “I follow Rome.” But he is not following Rome because the novus ordo Latin says, “pro multis,” which, according to Trent is translated “for you and for many.” (See Catechism of Trent). When the priest says, “for you and for all,” he is speaking a falsehood. If he is aware of what the holy of Council of Trent declared, and he persists in saying these false words, then he is lying; for Trent teaches that there is a reason why Jesus did not say “for all.” If the priest, during the consecration, says, “Jesus took the cup and said . . . for you and for all,” he makes Jesus a liar, because Jesus did not say this.
1 John 5:10 says: He that believeth not the Son, maketh Him a liar. John 3:36 says: He that believeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him. Furthermore, whereas the correct consecration formula demonstrates that the mysterium fidei, the mystery of faith, is the cup of Precious Blood, the new and eternal Testament, which shall be shed for you and for many, the novus ordo “replacement” falsely indicates that the mystery of faith is something wholly different.
Is this a grave sin? St. Alphonsus Ligouri, in his book History of Heresies, explains the difference between the “essential” and the “substantial” words of the consecration. In order to validly consecrate, the essential words are: This is My Body. This is My Blood. St. Alphonsus further teaches that these words belong to the substance of the consecration, “So that the priest who would omit them would commit a grievous sin, undoubtedly, but would validly consecrate.” Not only does the novus ordo priest omit the words, “for many,” but much worse, he makes Christ out to be a liar by saying something He did not say.
Msgr. Klaus Gamber, in his book The Reform of the Roman Liturgy, whose preface was written by Cardinal Ratzinger, said that, “The translation of “pro multis” (for many) to “for all” is not to be found in any ancient liturgical text. In the book, How Christ Said the First Mass, pg. 425, is said, concerning the chalice: “For this is the chalice of My Blood of the New and Eternal Testament, the Mystery of Faith, which shall be shed for you and for many unto the remission of sins.” Also, too, the Scriptures, inspired by the Holy Ghost, say, “for many.” See Mt. 26:28. All Scripture, [is] inspired of God, says St. Paul. See 2 Tim 3:16. Let’s not make the Holy Ghost a liar too.
These are grave deficiencies in the new “Mass.” Is it any wonder, then, that Cardinal Ottaviani and the other theologians, in their critique of the new “Mass” noted: “The new Mass . . . represents as a whole, and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session 22 of the Council of Trent.” And to say: “It is rather strong to claim that the new Mass is contrary to the Council of Trent; but displeasing as it is, it is true.”
One priest told me, “We follow the book.” I wonder if he would follow a faulty road map once it was pointed out to him. I wonder if he were boarding a train to Chicago and someone pointed out to him that that he was getting on a train to New York, would he still get on that train? I pray for the clergy who are following blindly all the changes in the Church, many of whom are sincere, no doubt, that they will see the truth, that they will do their homework, study theology and critical works, rather than play golf and read the paper. St. Anthony Mary Claret said that reading the paper was a waste of time, and that the clergy would do better reading the Word of God, where they would find the truth.
The Blessed Virgin, with tears in Her eyes, at La Salette, complained of the clergy, lamenting: “The priests, ministers of My Son, the priests, by their wicked lives, by their irreverence and their impiety in the celebration of the Holy Mysteries, by their love of money, their love of honours and pleasures, the priests have become cesspools of impurity. Yes, the priests are asking for vengeance, and vengeance is hanging over their heads. Woe to the priests and to those dedicated to God, who by their infidelity and by their wicked lives are crucifying My Son again! The sins of those consecrated to God cry out towards Heaven and call for vengeance, and now vengeance is at the door, for there is no one left to beg mercy and forgiveness for the people. There are no more generous souls, there is no one left worthy of offering a spotless sacrifice to the Eternal on behalf of the world. God will strike in an unprecedented way.”
“Woe to the inhabitants of the Earth! God will exhaust His wrath upon them, and no one will be able to escape so many afflictions together. The chiefs, the leaders of the people of God, have neglected prayer and penance, and the devil has bedimmed their intelligence. They have become wandering stars which the old devil will drag along with his tail to make them perish.”
The prophecy, contained in Apoc. 12:14, whereby a third part of the stars of heaven are dragged down by the devil, refers to the clergy, according to St. Alphonsus. Again, at Fatima our Blessed Mother said to Blessed Jacinta, “Priests must be very pure, and concern themselves only with the things that concern God,” indicating they were not doing so. Otherwise, why this counsel? At Garabandal, Spain She warned, “Many cardinals, and bishops, and priests are on the way to perdition, and are taking many souls with them . . . Less and less importance is being given to the Eucharist.”
And, in accordance with Her words, we have seen a steady decline in reverence, and a great increase in abuses and desecrations toward the Blessed Sacrament since the introduction of the novus ordo, Communion in the hand, Communion under both kinds, Communion received standing, and now, in remaining standing after the reception of Holy Communion. Recall how these very novelties were in the agenda of the anti-Apostle.
St. Nilus, from the fifth century, foresaw our times. He prophesied that after 1900, and toward the middle of the twentieth century, men would fly through the air like birds, swim through the sea like fish [submarines], and thoughts would go around the world in a twinkle of an eye: “Spending their lives in comfort without knowing, poor souls, that it is the deceit of the Antichrist. Shamelessness in dress and style of hair . . . no respect for parents and elders, love will disappear, and Christian pastors, bishops, and priests will become vain men, completely failing to distinguish the right-hand way from the left. At that time the morals and traditions of Christians and of the Church will change . . . lust, adultery, homosexuality, secret deeds [freemasonry], murder [abortion] will rule in society . . . the Churches will be deprived of God-fearing pastors, and woe to the Christians remaining in the world at that times; they will completely lose their faith because they will lack the opportunity of seeing the light of knowledge from anyone at all.”
Do we not see it? One priest I spoke with not long ago about immodest dress in church said: “You won’t hear the priests here say anything about that.” And this is true in so many places. Are these ministers willing to answer to God for all these sins of immodesty, which they were obligated to correct; and all the sins of lust and fornication they cause? Can you not see the fulfillment of St. Nilus’ prophecy?
Again, at Akita, Japan in 1973, Our Lady warned of the clergy being in opposition with one another because of the bad ones in the Church. She warned also of fire coming down from Heaven and destroying a great part of humanity, which also corresponds to the three days of darkness prophecies belonging to many saints, as well as to Scripture. These predict that the majority of mankind will perish with fire coming down from Heaven for three days and three nights. “Two thirds of the people will perish . . . one third will be brought through the fire . . .” Zach. 13:8-9
I am constantly reminded of the reported words of Our Lord to a nun in Mexico, concerning the liturgical problems. They correspond perfectly with the traditional customs of the Church. For what they are worth, and for your reflection:
June 7, 1970: “The Canon of the Mass should be said by the priest alone, in silence and in Latin, without diminishing even a single iota . . . Take note that with much sagacity My enemies alter the Scriptures. They could not bear today’s Epistle [James 1:26], and for that reason they changed it.” A few years ago I noticed that this Scripture had been excised from the readings for Mass. The verse states that if we do not bridle our tongue, our religion is in vain. Why the excision?
“It is true, My daughter, many of My priests know not what they do; they are full of darkness; they are blind . . . Right now there are many sacrilegious Communions and many Masses profaned . . . The priest should make profound adorations after the Consecration, and should also prolong the Elevations, in order to give example . . . It does not please Me that the custom of giving the embrace of peace within the celebration of the Mass has returned. It is a sinful custom and for that reason was abolished . . . Let them require once more the decorum and modesty of women, above all with consent to this lack of reverence . . . At Holy Mass let only sacred music be used, and may it be a curse if they continue profaning the churches with worldly music. Woe to those who have yielded to My enemies.”
On June 26, 1970 Our Lord said: “This mystery of My love should be honored by the faithful kneeling, and with great reverence . . . The faithful should always receive Holy Communion kneeling, and in profound silence. The Communicants must not approach the altar rail before placing themselves in the state of grace through a good confession, according to the usage and custom in My Catholic Church. . All those who have received Holy Communion should remain kneeling for a certain length of time after the Mass is ended (proper thanksgiving). . . My daughter, I am very much offended at present at the profanations of the Holy Sacrifice of the Altar, and because they have banished My Tabernacle form the center of the altar in My churches. My place should not be occupied by anyone, for you have no other Who is your God except Me.”
On August 5, 1971 Our Lord said: “Tell them that it is not the hands of thieves who commit sacrileges that wound Me the most . . . but rather the sacrilegious hands of the priests and the entire hierarchy.”
Many clergy do not handle the Blessed Sacrament reverently, nor take proper care of the Sacred Particles, nor worry one whit about Particles when giving Communion in the hand. The Council of Trent defined that Christ is present on the altar immediately after the Consecration of the bread and wine, and “under any part whatsoever of that species,” and if “anyone denies this . . . let him be anathema.” No. 876 and No. 885, Can. 3. Therefore, let the priests take care What they handle, lest He they handle improperly condemn them on the day of Judgment.
June 14, 1973: “Tell, openly, that the Catholics called Pentecostals are the fruit of the devil.” John Vennari, in an expose of the Pentecostal movement in the United States, gave ample evidence of the presence of the diabolical in the strange manifestations occurring among the adherents of this sect, which is one of thousands of perverse deformations of Christianity resulting from the Protestant revolt.
On October 29, 1974 Our Lord said: “Let the Holy Mass be in Latin and in the manner that the Council of Trent left it defined forever.”
February 2, 1975: “Come . . . come with Me to where My priests are!’ And He took me inside some nightclubs where there were some, inebriated, with women; some drinking, completely drunk; others, rascals, were chatting. All were without cassocks, in order not to be known by the people. Jesus was next to me and He was crying . . . Then He said to me: “Let us go to the convents of the women and we will see what they are doing!”
No one was there. Then He said to me: “Come!” And suddenly He showed me the nuns. Some were in amusement places, others in hotel rooms, sinning with men, and some of those men were priests, for Jesus told me so. Then He took me to the monasteries and seminaries for men, and the same solitude in the chapels and in the cells; and they, in the world at nighttime, enjoying the pleasures of the world and of the flesh. What sorrow!
Should we be surprised at these things in view of the fact of the recent scandals in the Church? Some years ago there was a priest in the diocese of Indianapolis whose behavior was wild. He spent inordinate amounts of money, traveled with a woman parishioner, and even went to Las Vegas. This man had an accident and was killed. There is another story about a prominent priest from Medjugorje who had an affair with a nun, fathered a child by her, eventually married her and had another child.
The children of Medjugorje reported the Blessed Mother said this priest was right and his superiors were wrong. One of the children said that the Blessed Mother dropped the Child Jesus, and the girl tried to catch Him. This is an outlandish statement, never before heard of in a true apparition. The “seers” tried to convince people that the Blessed Mother said Her birthday was August 5th, rather than September 8th, as if the Church for two thousand years has been in error on this point!
Distinguish the writings of Venerable Mary of Agreda, which were approbated by no less than seven popes. This Spanish mystic reported that Our Lady’s birthday is September 8th. Incredible as it is, some good Catholics believed the nonsense issuing forth from the false seers of Medjugorje. In fact, the bishop of Medjugorje carried out two thorough investigations of these alleged apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and declared that they were not supernatural. He asked that the people desist from making pilgrimages there.
These stories point out that our Lord does indeed have reason to lament over His clergy and religious. How many no longer wear their religious garb, as they are supposed to? If they wanted to be worldlings they should never have embraced the religious state. Keep in mind that by the 1930’s the Communists already had over 1000 operatives in the seminaries. What do you think these Communist priests are doing? Living a life of virtue, or corrupting the Church from within?
These things have been written for the clergy and the laity, that they you all may think seriously about where you should be, and what you should be doing. If you continue with the novus ordo “Mass” you run the risk of losing your faith, and also your soul, because the very essence of the new religion weakens the faith of Catholics; and this is due to the manifold profanations, sacrileges, and desecrations occurring therein.
Many of you are doing things you would never have dreamed of doing only forty years ago. Statistics show the bad fruits of the new religion: The number of priests has dropped from 58,000 to 45,000; seminarians from 49,000 to 4700; nuns from 104,000 to 8200; almost half of all Catholic schools have closed; only one in four Catholics now attend church on Sunday; there were 338 annulments in 1968, and 50,000 in 2002; only ten percent of lay religion teachers now accept Church teaching on contraception.
Both the clergy and the laity are showing, by their increasing lack of reverence for the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, that they are gradually losing the Faith. They should watch the video and search: Prophecies of Blessed Elizabeth Canori Mora. She saw God’s anger at the world, especially toward the clergy and the laity. She said His gaze was enough to incinerate the whole world! Our children’s salvation is at stake. The remedy? St. Vincent of Lerins said: “If some new contagion attempts to poison no longer a small part of the Church, but the whole Church at once, then [the Christian’s] great concern will be to attach himself to antiquity (Tradition), which can no longer be led astray by any lying novelty.”
O Mother of Good Counsel, pray for us that we be strong; and that we follow the path that Our Lord would have us take, for our own, and for our children’s salvation. Amen.