“OUTRAGES, SACRILEGES, AND INDIFFERENCE!” That’s what we see in the Catholic Church today. This title was taken from a prayer that the Angel of Portugal taught the little Fatima children in 1916, the year before the Blessed Mother began appearing to them on May 13, 1917. When the Angel came on this particular occasion, he brought the Blessed Sacrament, another name for Holy Communion, the taking of Christ’s flesh and blood for the life of our souls. Jesus said, “I am the living bread come down from heaven…the bread that I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world…If you do not eat my flesh and drink my blood, you shall have no life in you. If you do not eat my flesh and drink my blood, you shall have no life in you.” And if we want to be taken up on the last day, the day of judgement at the end of the world, we must receive his flesh and blood to do this, Jesus said. “He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath life everlasting, and I will raise him up on the last day.’’ St. John 6: 48 55, drbo.org. This is what we call Holy Communion, or Holy Eucharist, or Most Blessed Sacrament. Or, Jesus in the tabernacle, who resides in the tabernacle under the form of bread, fulfilling his promise, ‘’I will be with you all days, even until the consummation of the world.’’ St. Matthew 28:20.
So when the Angel came, bringing the Blessed Sacrament, he was holding a chalice with a Host above it, the Holy Communion under the form of bread (for those of you who are not Catholic and may not understand); The Host and chalice were left suspended in the air while the Angel got on the ground, bowed down with his head to the ground and said the prayer. While the Host was suspended above the chalice, a Eucharistic miracle was occurring. The Host was dripping with blood down into the chalice, which proved the Catholic doctrine that it is Jesus’ true body and blood in the Host. While bowing profoundly with his face all the way to the ground, the Angel repeated this prayer 3 times, and taught it to the children. He then instructed them to start praying the prayer, after his example, and each day when tending their sheep, they would bow profoundly to the ground like the Angel, repeating the prayer many times a day. This is the prayer he taught them, offering the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges, and indifference by which God is grievously offended. God is grievously offended it says, by all the outrages , sacrileges, and , indifference of men. Here is the prayer. We should say it often: O Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, I adore Thee profoundly, and I offer Thee the most Precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges, and indifference by which He is grievously offended. And by the infinite merits of the most Sacred Heart of Jesus, and of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg the conversion of poor sinners.
Any mortal sin is an outrage to God, because it is a total rejection of God, makes us his enemies, makes us objects of His hatred,* and puts us in danger of hellfire if we don’t repent. A sacrilege is a violation of any sacred person, object, or place . The most terrible sacrileges are those committed against Jesus in the most Holy Eucharist, especially receiving Holy Communion in mortal sin. St. Alphonsus de Liguori said when the sinner receives Holy Communion in mortal sin, he attempts to place Jesus on the throne of his heart alongside satan. An incomprehensible sin! Jesus told St. Bridget about the enormity of this sin saying, “There does not exist on earth a punishment sufficient enough to punish a sacrilegious Communion.” Now what do we see in the Catholic Church today, which allows so many of these sacrilegious Communions? We see immodest and improperly dressed women coming to church each Sunday, and even often throughout the week in immodest attire. Their sin is manifest. It is not secret as was Judas Iscariot. When the sin is manifest, the clergy are not allowed to give them Holy Communion, yet they do so all the time, allowing them to commit sacrilegious Communions, while they, the clergy, by their silence and lack of reproof, their indifference, are party to their sin. Our Lord compares them to dumb dogs not able bark , Isaias, 56;10. “His watchmen are all blind, they are all ignorant: dumb dogs not able to bark, seeing vain things, sleeping and loving dreams. “ Fr. Donald Calloway, in his excellent talk on the rosary, quotes Our Lord to a priest who would not speak out: “Ravening wolves are roaming all up and down Europe, and you, unfaithful dog, are silent!”
Silence implies consent, one of the nine ways of being accessory to another’s sin. When one of the magistrates was attempting to prove St. Thomas More’s silence was a protest against the king’s marriage, saying it was bellowing all up and down England, St. Thomas objected and said, “Not so! If we must construe anything by my silence, we must construe consent. That is the law…” Now these immodest women who come into church are outraging Our Lord in His own house. When they go to Holy Communion unworthily, they are committing many sacrileges. And the indifference of the clergy gravely offends God because they have not the backbone to correct their sin. Outrages, sacrileges, and indifference! St. Alphonsus, in his book, DIGNITIES AND DUTIES OF A PRIEST states, “What is venial in a lay person is grievous in a priest. Because many lay persons sin through ignorance, but the priest has been trained to know right from wrong, and they know what they do when they sin. They sin against the light.”
This is not to mention all the secret sins of men who come to church, who, without confessing their sins, go to Holy Communion unworthily. The multitude of Catholics, Novus Ordo mostly, are guilty of this. Communion lines are long, confession lines are very short. Now even devout Catholics know how hard it is sometimes not to fall into sin. So how are the lukewarm and the cold faring? How many parents do you see who bring their children to church not properly dressed? What is surprising, even in traditional circles, you will see mothers modestly dressed with long skirts and dresses, and yet they will have little short dresses on their daughters. We must be informed. Ignorance causes a lot of sins. For those who wish to know what is considered modest dress, the site, saintsworks.net will inform them. So why did the Blessed Mother supposedly tell Fr. Gobbi that now there were no Eucharistic celebrations where sacrileges were not committed? Here is her message , # 330, Mother of the Eucharist, 8/8/1986: “But above all, it is the sacrileges which today form, around my Immaculate Heart, a painful crown of thorns. In these times, how many Communions are made and how many sacrileges perpetrated! It can be said that there is no longer any Eucharistic celebration where sacrilegious Communions are not made. If you only saw with my eyes how great this wound is which has contaminated the whole Church and paralyzes it, halts it, and makers it impure and so very sick! If you only saw with my eyes, you too would shed copious tears with me.”
So how can it be that in every Eucharistic celebration sacrileges are committed? Another reason is Communion in the hand. For one thing, Fr. Nicholas Gruner explained that the law of the Church is on the tongue, quoting Pope Paul VI from Memoriale Domini: “The traditional manner is to be retained…” “The traditional manner is to be retained,” the Pope said. He explained that Communion in the hand is only an Indult, with conditions attached, and there must be a justifiable reason to grant an Indult. Fr. Gruner goes on to explain that people are supposed to look in their hands for Particles, because these particles that break off the Host, the Church teaches, is God. Why do you think the clergy used to have the paten under the chin while giving Holy Communion? To catch any fallen Hosts, or Particles. Why do you think the priest purifies the paten after Holy Communion? Why do you think the priest rubs his fingers over the chalice after he consecrates the Host? All these safeguards were to protect Our Lord even in the smallest visible Particles. So Fr. Gruner explained that people are supposed to look in their hands for Particles, because these Particles break off the Host, and if people are not looking in their hands, these Particles can be falling out of their hands onto the floor, and the next Novus Ordo walking along may step on the Sacred Particle, trampling Our Lord underfoot, as the prophecy of David says, “Have mercy on me, O God, for man has trodden me underfoot.” Psalm 55:2. All quotations taken from the Douay Rheims Bible, drbo.org. Novus Ordo I say, because traditionalists don’t take Communion in the hand, only on the tongue. They do not have to worry about trodding Our Lord underfoot, because their clergy protect the Lord with all the safeguards in place. I have never heard a priest from the pulpit or from the altar tell the congregation that they absolutely must look in their hands for Particles. Never!
Fr. Gruner goes on to explain, that if a Particle is dropped, a sacrilege has been committed, whether knowingly or unknowingly. Now it is unlikely that Particles do not break off in every distribution of Communion in the hand. Bishop Juan Rudolfo Laise wrote, “With Communion in the hand, a miracle would be required during each distribution of Communion to avoid some Particles from falling to the ground or remaining in the hand of the faithful.” – COMMUNION IN THE HAND: DOCUMENTS AND HISTORY.
In the exorcism of Emily Rose, the demons admitted bringing Communion in the hand back, was their idea. In the book, AA-1025 MEMOIRS OF AN ANTI-APOSTLE, one of the communist infiltrators in the Church in the 1930’s, he said, “Moreover, the faithful will have to break themselves of the habit of kneeling, and this will be absolutely forbidden when receiving Communion. Very soon, the Host will be laid in the hand in order that all notion of the Sacred be erased.” Pages 110-111. He goes on to talk about Communion under both kinds, changing the words of the Mass to the vernacular, taking out the words from the consecration, ”Holy and venerable hands,’’ and on and on it goes. Almost all his ideas are in the New Mass, the Novus Ordo. Touching the Host itself with unconsecrated hands is in itself probably a sacrilege, because St. Thomas Acquinas taught, “Out of reverence for this Sacrament, nothing touches it except what is consecrated..” And we have an example in the Old Testament , when Oza reached forth to touch the Ark, to keep it from falling, God struck him dead for it, because no one was supposed to touch the Ark, 2nd Book of Kings (2 Samuel), 6:6,7. We should not be taking Communion in the hand, for all these reasons. Fr. Benedict Groeschel, C.F.R. was quoted from an EWTN talk: “Also, I want to state very clearly that the experiment of giving Communion in the hand has been a disaster.” You might ask yourself, Why did all the bishops of the United States push for this, when Pope Paul VI had already mandated “the traditional manner of receiving is to be retained?” Michael Davies published a booklet on Communion in the Hand and Similar Frauds where he explains the truth of the matter. You can find the full text of “Communion In The Hand And Similar Frauds Michael Davies” here: https://tinyurl.com/y37p5qh5.
Countless sacrileges, desecrations, and thefts of the Most Holy Eucharist have been committed since the introduction of Communion in the hand. One lady in the Louisville area was caught stealing Hosts at Communion time. She would come in close to the end of the Mass, flop down and not say a prayer, and go to Holy Communion and walk right out after Mass with it. One gentleman was suspicious. He alerted the priest. He wasn’t sure. Then a few weeks later, she dropped in again, and this time the man followed her out, and she was walking to the car and still had the Host in her hand! He warned her never to come back, and alerted the pastor again. It appears now that the pastor no longer gives Communion in the hand, and this should be a warning to the bishops and the clergy, to return to Communion only on the tongue, with all the safeguards in place, with the paten under the chin. Otherwise, they may be subjecting Our Lord to abominations and horrible desecrations in satanic Masses. But the modernists will tell you, “This is the way they did it in the early Church!” Not so! I have here a paper quoting the Council of Trent saying, “Communion on the tongue was an apostolic tradition.”
Many years ago I received a postcard in the mail with a picture of a statue of the Blessed Mother which had been taken. When the picture was returned, the Blessed Mother had a Host at her mouth, a black line through one arm, and a white line through the other. Mama Rosa explained: “The Host at the mouth means the Blessed Mother wants us to receive only on the tongue. The black line means she doesn’t want us receiving in the hand; the white line means we shouldn’t be giving it to little children in the hand. The little children are not culpable but the adults are.” As I was ignorant like most everyone else, I was taking Communion in the hand and didn’t know better, this postcard got me to asking myself, “What’s wrong with Communion in the hand?” and it was then I started doing my research.
Consider, if the clergy must purify the vessels from all Particles after Holy Communion, who is purifying all the hands that have taken Communion in the hand? Why haven’t the clergy informed people to look in their hands for Particles, lest they fall and be desecrated? Why aren’t all the people required to come up and purify their hands after taking Communion? Why aren’t they required to purify their hands before Holy Communion as the priest does? Fr. Ronald Tangen informed his people: “You must look in your hand! That is God there! You can’t just brush it off! It must be consumed!” A quote from Michael Davies book, quoting St. Cyril, who compared the losing of the Particles with gold dust, or the loss of one of your very own limbs: “For if you mislay any, you would clearly suffer a loss, as it were, from one of your own limbs. Tell me, if anyone gave you gold-dust, would you not take hold of it with every possible care, ensuring that you do not mislay any of it or sustain any loss? So will you not be much more cautious to ensure that not a crumb falls away from that which is more precious than gold or precious stones ?” Therefore, shouldn’t the clergy invite everyone up on the altar to purify their hands after Holy Communion? Realistically, yes. But practically speaking, this is not possible. So what does this tell you? It tells you no one should be taking Holy Communion in the hand but the priest!
Therefore, let us pray this prayer often, given by the Angel to the children of Fatima, to make reparation for the many outrages, sacrileges, and indifference, by which Almighty God is grievously offended. And let us do what we can to end this abominable practice from hell to desecrate our Lord. Inform people, share this article, do videos on youtube, reference Fr. Nicholas Gruner/Ask me a Question and Bishop Athanasius Synder videos, read the books by Bishop Juan Rudolfo Laise and Michael Davies. Remember, , Fr. John Hardon once stated,”Whatever you can do to stop Communion in the hand will be blessed by God.”
A PAPAL DECREE CONCERNING MODESTY – Pope Pius XI, 1930 August 2021 – MotherofGodlibrary.org
An Open Letter to the Clergy Who think, May We Not Hope All Souls Go To Heaven? https://motherofgodlibrary.org/2024/01/19/
If you have found this article helpful, please consider sharing it with your bishop, your pastor, and others you may know.